Free
Research Article  |   May 1991
A Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Two Types of Occupational Therapy Services
Author Affiliations
  • Phyllis J. Trahey, MS, OTR/L, is Director, Department of Occupational Therapy, Moss Rehabilitation Hospital, 1200 Tabor Road, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141
Article Information
Health and Wellness / Musculoskeletal Impairments / Rehabilitation, Participation, and Disability / Practice
Research Article   |   May 1991
A Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Two Types of Occupational Therapy Services
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, May 1991, Vol. 45, 397-400. doi:10.5014/ajot.45.5.397
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, May 1991, Vol. 45, 397-400. doi:10.5014/ajot.45.5.397
Abstract

The demand for efficient and effective health care prompted this study comparing the treatment outcomes and personnel costs of two types of occupational therapy service provision for the patient with a total hip replacement. System 1 used traditional individual treatment as the primary service provision method, with group treatment used as an adjunct. System 2 used group treatment as the primary intervention method, with individual treatment as the adjunct. Program evaluation research found the study subjects to be demographically homogeneous with no difference in treatment outcomes relative to four specific functional performance goals. Direct labor costs, however, were reduced by more than one third for the System 2 patients. The results of this study suggest that for specific rehabilitation patient populations, group treatment could be a cost-effective method of occupational therapy service provision.