Julie Helene Clyde, Dina Brooks, Jill I. Cameron, Nancy M. Salbach; Validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale With Occupational Therapists. Am J Occup Ther 2016;70(2):7002280010p1-7002280010p9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.017061.
Download citation file:
© 2017 American Occupational Therapy Association
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC), and construct validity of the Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) scale among occupational therapists.
METHOD. In a cross-sectional mail survey, 126 occupational therapists completed the EPIC scale and a questionnaire to provide data for validity testing. Seventy-nine occupational therapists (63%) completed a second EPIC scale a median of 24 days later.
RESULTS. Test–retest reliability was .92 (95% confidence interval [.88, .95]). The MDC values at the 90% and 95% confidence levels were 3.9 percentage points and 4.6 percentage points, respectively. The total EPIC score was significantly associated with holding a master’s or doctoral degree; education in evidence-based practice (EBP); higher EBP knowledge and skill; and frequently searching, reading, and using research findings in clinical decision making (p < .05).
CONCLUSION. The EPIC scale has excellent reliability and acceptable construct validity for use in evaluating EBP self-efficacy among occupational therapists.
For full access to this article, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.