Free
Research Article
Issue Date: January/February 2008
Published Online: January 01, 2008
Updated: April 30, 2020
Upper-Limb Kinematics of the Presumed-to-Be-Unaffected Side After Brain Injury
Takayuki Nakamura; Beatriz C. Abreu; Rita M. Patterson; William L. Buford, Jr.; Kenneth J. Ottenbacher
Author Affiliations
  • Takayuki Nakamura, PhD, Doctoral Fellow, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
  • Beatriz C. Abreu, PhD, OTR, FAOTA, Director of Occupational Therapy, Transitional Learning Center at Galveston, TX, and Clinical Professor, University of Texas Medical Branch, 1528 Post Office Street, Galveston, TX 77554; babreu@tlc-galveston.org
  • Rita M. Patterson, PhD, is Professor, Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
  • William L. Buford Jr., PhD, is Professor, Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
  • Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, PhD, OTR, FAOTA, is Professor and Director, Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Article Information
Neurologic Conditions / Traumatic Brain Injury / Rehabilitation, Disability, and Participation
Research Article   |   January 01, 2008
Upper-Limb Kinematics of the Presumed-to-Be-Unaffected Side After Brain Injury
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January/February 2008, Vol. 62, 46-50. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.1.46
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January/February 2008, Vol. 62, 46-50. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.1.46
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the kinematics of the presumed-to-beunaffected upper limbs of people with brain injury (BI) compared with people without brain injury (WBI) during reaching.

METHOD. Seventeen people with BI with no apparent motor deficit and 17 people WBI were measured and compared. A six-camera motion analysis system was used to determine movement duration, average speed, and smoothness during reaching.

RESULTS. The group of people with BI was found to be significantly longer in movement duration (p < .0001), were slower in average speed (p < .0001), and had decreased smoothness (p < .0001) during reaching than the group of people WBI.

CONCLUSION. The results suggest that people with BI may have undetected motor deficit in their presumed-to-be-unaffected upper extremities. Further research is needed to explore the upper-limb motor performance and the impact on function and safety.