Free
Brief Report  |   September 2002
The Relationship of Infant Sleep and Play Positioning to Motor Milestone Achievement
Joyce S. Salls; Lyn N. Silverman; Carolyn M. Gatty
Author Affiliations
  • Joyce S. Salls, MS, OTR/L, BCP, is Assistant Professor, Master of Occupational Therapy Program, Chatham College, Woodland Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232; salls@chatham.edu
  • Lyn N. Silverman, MEd, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Master of Occupational Therapy Program, Chatham College, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Carolyn M. Gatty, MS, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Master of Occupational Therapy Program, Chatham College, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Article Information
Pediatric Evaluation and Intervention / Departments / Brief Report
Brief Report   |   September 2002
The Relationship of Infant Sleep and Play Positioning to Motor Milestone Achievement
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, September/October 2002, Vol. 56, 577-580. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.5.577
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, September/October 2002, Vol. 56, 577-580. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.5.577
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Limited information is available on how sleep and play positions affect infant gross motor skills and occupational development. The overall objective of this descriptive developmental pilot study was to compare normative and sampled infants relative to sleep and awake positioning using the Denver II Gross Motor Sector.

METHOD. A cross-sectional sample of 66 infants 2.0 (n = 23), 4.1 (n = 26), and 6.0 (n = 17) months of age were administered the Denver II Gross Motor Sector. Caregivers identified infants’ primary sleep positions and amount of awake-time in prone. Data were analyzed using chi-square goodness-of-fit tests.

RESULTS. The sample of 2.0-month-old supine and side sleeping infants differed significantly from the normative population on three gross motor milestones. Two-month-old infants spending 15 min or fewer of awake-time in prone passed the gross motor milestones at significantly lower percentages than the normative population. No significant differences were noted between sampled and normative populations at 4.1 and 6.0 months of age.

CONCLUSION. Results suggest that infant gross motor development may be related to sleep and play positioning. Information regarding infants’ sleep and awake positioning may be important to occupational therapists when evaluating gross motor development. Implications for caregiver education and future research are proposed.