Free
Research Article
Issue Date: January 01, 2003
Published Online: May 06, 2014
Updated: June 13, 2018
Qualitative Data Analysis: Challenges and Dilemmas Related to Theory and Method
Author Affiliations
  • Diana M. Bailey, EdD, OTR, FAOTA, is Associate Professor, Tufts University, Boston School of Occupational Therapy, Medford, MA 02155; diana.bailey@tufts.edu
  • Jeanne M. Jackson, PhD, OTR, FAOTA, is Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar Street, CHP-133, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9003; jmjackso@usc.edu
Article Information
Special Section: Qualitative Research
Research Article   |   January 01, 2003
Qualitative Data Analysis: Challenges and Dilemmas Related to Theory and Method
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January/February 2003, Vol. 57, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.57
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January/February 2003, Vol. 57, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.57
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to initiate a discussion of the struggles and challenges we encountered as we developed a method of analysis for a particular qualitative study. We present our thinking process showing the questions that arose, the theoretical ideas on which we relied, and the decisions we made at crucial junctures. Portions from several theoretical frames used as the basis for the analysis are presented and include Polkinghorne’s (1995) narrative inquiry, Glaser and Strauss’s (1967) and Charmaz’s (2000) grounded theory, Riessman’s (1990b) mixed approach to analysis, and Rosaldo’s (1989) ideas on reflexivity. Examples from the study are used to illustrate points in the analysis.