Free
Research Article
Issue Date: January 01, 2006
Published Online: May 05, 2014
Updated: June 13, 2018
The Effect of Three Alternative Keyboard Designs on Forearm Pronation, Wrist Extension, and Ulnar Deviation: A Meta-Analysis
Author Affiliations
  • Nancy A. Baker, ScD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 5023 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260; nab36@pitt.edu
  • Erin L. Cidboy, MS, OTR/L, is Research Associate, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Article Information
Evidence-Based Practice / Hand and Upper Extremity / Handwriting and Keyboarding
Research Article   |   January 01, 2006
The Effect of Three Alternative Keyboard Designs on Forearm Pronation, Wrist Extension, and Ulnar Deviation: A Meta-Analysis
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January/February 2006, Vol. 60, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.1.40
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January/February 2006, Vol. 60, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.1.40
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

The growth of computer keyboard use in the workplace is believed to be one important determinant of the increased prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity (MSD-UE). One possible contributing factor to the development of MSD-UE is the flat standard keyboard, which places the forearm and wrist in biomechanically awkward postures. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy of three alternative keyboard designs, adjustable slope (AS), split fixed-angle (FA), and adjustable open-tented (AT), in reducing forearm pronation, wrist extension, and ulnar deviation. Analyses of pooled effect size from six studies indicated that the AT had a large effect on pronation (r = 0.85) and ulnar deviation whereas the FA had a large effect only on ulnar deviation (r = 0.79). The AS was found to have a large effect (r = 0.66) on wrist extension. The FA had a moderate effect on pronation (r = 0.33) and wrist extension (r = 0.30). None of these keyboards were found to have a significant effect on all three postures. This meta-analysis has implications for clinicians by providing objective information that may assist with the selection of an alternative keyboard that best reduces an identified problematic posture.