Free
Research Article
Issue Date: July 01, 1993
Published Online: May 19, 2014
Updated: June 13, 2018
Use of Uniform Terminology by Occupational Therapists
Author Affiliations
  • Michael J. Borst, MS, OTR, is an Occupational Therapist, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. At the time of this study, he was a student in the professional Master of Science in Occupational Therapy program, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. (Mailing address: 313 North Rosa Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53705)
  • David L. Nelson, PhD, OTR, FAOTA, is Professor of Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio
Article Information
Research
Research Article   |   July 01, 1993
Use of Uniform Terminology by Occupational Therapists
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, July 1993, Vol. 47, 611-618. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.7.611
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, July 1993, Vol. 47, 611-618. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.7.611
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

Uniform Terminology for Occupational Therapy – Second Edition (American Occupational Therapy Association, 1989b) was published to foster consistency in terminology among occupational therapists. In this study, agreement between occupational therapists and Uniform Terminology about the definition and categorization of 15 terms was examined. Agreement was measured on 113 responses from a randomly selected sample of 180 occupational therapists. Low levels of agreement were found on both definition of terms (71.9 mean percentage of agreement, SD = 12.4) and categorization of terms into larger conceptual categories (34.9 mean percentage of agreement, SD = 11.7). Therapists selected an alternative definition more often than the one given by Uniform Terminology on 2 of 15 terms and selected an alternative categorization more often than the one given in Uniform Terminology on 8 of 15 terms. These results indicate that therapists do not agree with many Uniform Terminology definitions and categorizations.