Free
Research Article  |   March 1984
Motivation as a Factor of Perceived Exertion in Purposeful versus Nonpurposeful Activity
Author Affiliations
  • Marjorie A. Kircher, M.S., OTR, is Assistant Director of Occupational Therapy, and hand specialist, Oregon Health Sciences University Hospital, Portland, Oregon 97201
Article Information
Complementary/Alternative Approaches / Features
Research Article   |   March 1984
Motivation as a Factor of Perceived Exertion in Purposeful versus Nonpurposeful Activity
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, March 1984, Vol. 38, 165-170. doi:10.5014/ajot.38.3.165
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, March 1984, Vol. 38, 165-170. doi:10.5014/ajot.38.3.165
Abstract

Perceived exertion during the performance of purposeful and nonpurposeful activity was studied in 26 women. The subjects acted as their own controls in the performance of both kinds of exercise. The two exercises were jumping rope, defined as a purposeful activity, and jumping in place without a rope, defined as a nonpurposeful activity. In each activity the subjects exercised to reach the subjective point of “very hard work” on the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion. Duration and cessation of exercise were entirely controlled by the performers. Heart rate responses during and immediately after cessation of exercise, measured by electrocardiographic telemetry, and duration of exercise in seconds were compared for the two types of exercise. Results showed that heart rate increase at a given rate of perceived exertion was significantly higher (.001) for jumping rope. This raises the possibility that workload was inadvertently perceived by the performers to be greater in nonpurposeful activity and provides support for the hypothesis that purposeful activity serves as an intrinsic motivator to the performer.