Research Platform  |   August 2016
Effective Interventions for Stroke Recovery: Comparing Modified Constraint-Induced With Occupation-Based Interventions
Camille Skubik-Peplaski, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, BCP; Robin Stroud, MS, OTR/L; Dana Howell, OTD, OTR/L; Melba Custer, PhD, OT/L; Lumy Sawaki, MD, PhD
Author Affiliations
  • Eastern Kentucky University
  • Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital
Article Information
Neurologic Conditions / Stroke / Translational Research
Research Platform   |   August 2016
Effective Interventions for Stroke Recovery: Comparing Modified Constraint-Induced With Occupation-Based Interventions
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, August 2016, Vol. 70, 7011520288p1. doi:10.5014/ajot.2016.70S1-RP101B
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, August 2016, Vol. 70, 7011520288p1. doi:10.5014/ajot.2016.70S1-RP101B
Abstract

Date Presented 4/7/2016

Eight intervention sessions using mCIT or occupation-based activities was effective for motor recovery. The mCIT group improved most on motor assessments, and the occupation-based group had more change in the occupational performance assessments. Changes were also noted with the experience of moving.

Primary Author and Speaker: Camille Skubik-Peplaski

Additional Speakers: Robin Stroud, Dana Howell, Melba Custer

Contributing Author: Lumy Sawaki