Poster Session
Issue Date: August 01, 2019
Published Online: November 15, 2019
Updated: November 26, 2019
A Comparison of Computerized and Paper and Pencil Versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Mackenzie Rodgers; Elena Donoso Brown, PhD, OTR/L; Sarah Wallace, PhD, CCC-SLP; Richard Simpson, PhD, ATP; Alexander Kranjec, PhD; Kristin D'Acunto, MPA, PA-C; Caroline Agostino; Mary Rose Zoeckler
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Article Information
Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia / Geriatrics/Productive Aging / Neurologic Conditions / Assessment/Measurement
Poster Session   |   August 01, 2019
A Comparison of Computerized and Paper and Pencil Versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, August 2019, Vol. 73, 7311500023. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.73S1-PO7004
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, August 2019, Vol. 73, 7311500023. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.73S1-PO7004
Abstract

Date Presented 04/06/19

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) paper and electronic versions when administered to older adults. Additionally, factors related to participant preferences and familiarity with computerized tablets were considered. This research encourages practitioners to be cognizant of the mode of assessments they use as it may impact client performance.

Primary Author and Speaker: Mackenzie Rodgers

Additional Authors and Speakers: Elena Donoso Brown

Contributing Authors: Sarah Wallace, Richard Simpson, Alexander Kranjec, Kristin D'Acunto, Caroline Agostino, Mary Rose Zoeckler