Research Article
Issue Date: March/April 2020
Published Online: January 28, 2020
Updated: April 30, 2020
Parents’ Perspectives: An Expanded View of Occupational and Co-Occupational Performance in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Author Affiliations
  • Ashlea D. Cardin, OTD, OTR/L, BCP, CNT, is Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy Department, Missouri State University, Springfield; ashleacardin@missouristate.edu
Article Information
Pediatric Evaluation and Intervention / Research Articles
Research Article   |   January 28, 2020
Parents’ Perspectives: An Expanded View of Occupational and Co-Occupational Performance in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January 2020, Vol. 74, 7402205030. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.034827
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January 2020, Vol. 74, 7402205030. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.034827
Abstract

Importance: One limitation of occupation-based neonatal practice is the lack of clarity surrounding what parent and infant occupations exist in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Without clear definitions and examples of these constructs, occupational therapists may not recognize or value them as part of practice.

Objective: To explore concepts of occupational and co-occupational performance in the NICU and provide richly expanded descriptions of parent and infant occupations in this setting.

Design: Phenomenological study with convenience sampling. Participants engaged in semistructured interviews. Inductive content analysis, in vivo and process coding methods, and cross-case analysis were used. Member checking and expert review of emergent themes were used to ensure authenticity.

Setting: A metropolitan 48-bed Level 3 NICU with single-family rooms in the midwestern United States.

Participants: Fourteen parents (mean age = 29.7 yr; range = 19–37 yr) volunteered for the study.

Results: Five themes of active occupational engagement emerged: (1) perceiving “they” versus “I”; (2) maintaining proximity; (3) expressing emotions, values, and beliefs; (4) addressing health issues; and (5) analyzing. A matrix framework displayed emergent themes with definitions of parent occupations, infant occupations, and parent–infant co-occupations. Examples of both directly observable and hidden occupations were found at matrix intersections.

Conclusions and Relevance: Occupational performance prevalently reflected attempts to balance power differentials and pursue meaningful engagement through observable and hidden participation in caregiving. Findings suggest that beyond typical occupations (e.g., feeding, socializing), neonatal therapists can address the doing, being, and becoming occupations expressed by parents in this study.

What This Article Adds: Parents described five broad thematic categories of NICU-based occupation and co-occupation, which may be valuable to therapists seeking to strengthen the occupational focus of neonatal intervention. Neonatal therapists may need to advocate for service provision policy change to fully address the observable and nonobservable doing, being, and becoming occupational and co-occupational needs of parents and infants.